Sustainable Agriculture Essay Example for Free

Sustainable Agriculture Essay As the main objectives of the fieldtrip are to view the integrated system farm, therefore we have to relate this fieldtrip with our subject, Sustainable Agriculture. Based on the definitions of the sustainable agriculture, it is defined as an integrated system of plant and animal production practices having a site-specific application that will, over the long term: a) Satisfy human food and fiber needs, b) Enhance environment quality and the natural resource base upon which the agricultural economy depends, c) Make the most efficient use of non-renewable resources and on-farm resources and integrate, were appropriate, natural biological cycles and controls, d) Sustain the economic viability of farm operations, and e) Enhance the quality of life for farmers and society as a whole. Hence, there are several principles in sustainable agriculture must comprise of which are economic viability, environmental sound and socially. These principles we can found it in MARDI station Sg. Baging as we tour around in the station. Sustainable agriculture Principles’: 1) Economy viability Economically viable means that the farmers can produce enough for self sufficient income and gain sufficient returns. Economic viability is measured not only in terms of direct produce but also in terms of functions such as conserving resources and minimizing risks also. 2) Ecologically sound Ecologically sound means that quality of natural resources is maintained and the vitality of the entire agro-ecosystems from human beings, crops and animals to soil organisms is enhanced. This is best ensured when the soil is managed and the health of crops, animal and human is maintained through biological processes. 3) Socially Just Socially just means that the resources and power are distributed in such a way that the basic need of all members of society are met and their rights to land use, adequate capital, technical assistance are assured. All people should have opportunity to participate in the decision making. After understands what is mean by these principles, hence, we, as the students have to relate on which criteria that MARDI station Sg. Baging portrayed. Sustainable Agriculture at MARDI station Sg. Baging Some of the criteria that are showed by MARDI station Sg. Baging are: 1) Economic viable i) Varieties of Livestock Products| MARDI station Sg. Baging has successfully breed local sheep with Dorper sheep species from African that are high quality in meat. This species are great meat producers which can reach a live weight of 90-120 kg and ewes 50-80kg. It is suitable to sale in domestic market and international sale of prime lamb meat. Currently, MARDI sale it based on demand. Besides, its wool also can be commercialized as material for pillow. | ii) sheep dung as manure products| In addition, sheep dung from Dorper species also can be used as biologically manure for plants here and also can be commercialize. About 25 kg, these manures are sold at RM 5 while RM 7- RM8 for treated one. One of the staff on duty said that the sheep dung is collected in built drain near the sheep -pen and it will move to manure trap behind the sheep-pen. It does not have any uncomfortable smell as the staff insert in food pallets products named Genkimo that use a technology to make it less odor. | iii) Commercialize screwpine coconut product| Besides, there also plants Screwpine Coconut or also called as ‘Kelapa Pandan’. It is tasty, sweet, and has a thick layer of coconut flesh. It is suitable for coconut shake and coconut jelly to be commercialize. It is sold at RM 1. 50 for each coconut. | | | 2) Environmentally sound i) Uses of natural sources of water| For drinking water, watering the plants, the station used underground water sources by using a machine that is called tube well. It is function by using generator and also can be handled manually. It is not only used as sources of watering and drinking but also use for other necessity like washing the instrument, cleaning the sheep-pen and others. Even though, the station is near the sea, but it is not salty and can be used as drinking water for the animal without treated. | iii) Integrated pest management| The uniqueness of MARDI is they apply integrated pest management as one of the system in handling pests. It is a system that are friendly to environment where it is also count in Air Index in the respective area before treat the plants. Before treat, they will analysis what disease attacks the tree to avoid repetition of treatment. It is not only waste the pesticide but indirectly also pollute the air in local area if conduct frequently. Therefore, integrated pest management is about biologically control of the disease and attacks of pest and periodic treated of pests using pesticides. | iv) Biologically control of pest (natural)| For protecting the fruits from fruits flies, they wrap it with newspaper. It is a method| | |

My First Host Family :: Personal Narrative Studying Abroad Essays

My First Host Family The situation I was presented with was somewhat ironic. In preparation for my departure to Study Service Term in Costa Rica, I worried a great deal about my first host family. Would they be mean? Would I be able to understand their Spanish? Would I like their food? These were the main concerns for me then. At no time did I stop to consider that it might be difficult to leave my first host family, the thought never entered my head. After all, they were not really my family, why should it be hard? I was in a different country, thousands of miles away from the land of my birth, yet I had become so comfortable that it was hard to break away. So much of this place had left an impact on me that I didn’t want to consider leaving. These people took me, a total stranger, into their home, gave me food and shelter, and in only six short weeks made me feel like a genuine part of their family. I may not have understood before, but I was forced to deal with it now: this would be one of the longest nights of my life. Facing the inevitable, I said goodnight to my family as I did every other evening, and headed towards my room for the night. The hot sun had given way to the night, and crickets now sang in the infinite blackness outside my window. The curtains danced as cool, sweet breezes leaked effortlessly into my room, helping to calm my shaky soul. Yet I lay there for an eternity, eyes fixed on the intricate patterns of cracks in the ceiling as the wonders and worries of what was to come now swirled through my head. How would I make it for another six weeks? What would my next family be like? How could I possibly be as happy there as I was here? I finally fell asleep, but not the deep sleep that cleanses and offers comfort, rather a shallow trance tormented by visions and dreams, thoughts and emotions, fears and concerns. I traveled in and out of consciousness, seeking unsuccessfully to grasp something to hold onto, something stable in my life. The house was dark and motionless when my alarm jerked me out of slumber; my father, brother and sister had all left for the day already. I rose unrefreshed and headed for the bathroom, feeling as if I hadn’t slept at all.

An argument against abortion in relation to considering the mothers well being Essay

Abortion is a highly-debated topic in society today.   People on each side of the argument have very strong views.   They each make good points that are valid.   But they often go so far as to harass the other side of the debate, they openly attack the people with beliefs the opposite of their own.   In this particular debate, were arguing the constitutionality of banning abortion with or without an exception to the ban.   This exception is regarding the health of the mother.   The yes side of the argument says that it was constitutional to ban abortion outright.   They believe in the constitutionality of the ban even without a clause of exception for the health of the mother.   This means that even if the mother’s health is in imminent danger, even if she is in danger of dying, she still cannot get an abortion.   These people believe that abortions are wrong and they don’t even condone them when continuing the pregnancy could mean the mother would die .  Ã‚   The strengths of their argument are that they believe abortion to be murder.   Technically, if you believe that a fetus is a person then yes, it is murder.   They believe that all murder is wrong, even if it would save the mother.   The no-argument says that this ban is wrong in itself.   It needs to have an exemption to protect the well-being of the mother.   They’re all for protecting the health of the mother.   If the mother’s life is in imminent danger, then she should easily be able to get a legal abortion.   It’s not constitutional to ban abortion outright with no clause to protect the mother. A rational choice theory would likely explain why so many people are against these exceptions in banning abortions.   They think the life of this fetus is worth more than the mother.   They believe this because the fetus has a whole life ahead of them while the mother has already lived through a number of years.   They make the rational choice to favor the life of the fetus over that of the mother. The most surprising thing about this argument is how vehemently the yes side argues that abortion is murder.   They believe that an abortion is a murder even if that abortion would save the life of the mother.   That’s ridiculous.   It’s not fair to essentially end the life of the mother just to save the fetus.   You’re killing one to save the other.   That’s their exact argument against abortion.   They abhor abortion for killing the fetus but in these instances, it’s killing the mother.   So if either way, someone will die it’s not fair to automatically favor the mother like this.   I understand that the no argument believes that these exceptions in the ban are not right but I disagree.   I think that the exceptions are necessary.   It’s unfair to arbitrarily favor the wellbeing of the fetus over that of the mother.   I think that exceptions to these abortion bans are absolutely necessary.   We need to provide clauses in case the wellbeing of the mother is in danger.

Ethical Dilemma In Architecture And Engineering - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1425 Downloads: 8 Date added: 2019/05/18 Category Society Essay Level High school Topics: Ethical Dilemma Essay Did you like this example? To what extent should efficiency be prioritized over the potential risk of human life when building a structure? Everyday each person goes inside a building whether it be your house, for your job, school, grocery shopping, eating, or even working out, and each year these structures collapse due to construction efficiency. 58% of multistory failures were due to construction problems and with no warning that the building is unsafe. In the structural engineering field one issue is that the structural engineers have a dead line to meet and a money budget and the engineer might not go to the engineering manager to get the math checked. These engineers go ahead with building a structure not thinking about the later consequences and the safety risk of a failing structures and harming lives. The ethical dilemma within this is that construction need to occur at specific rate while safety could be jeopardized, this is putting money or efficiency over life. This then leads to the question: to what extent should efficiency be prioritized over the potential risk of human life when building a structure? Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Ethical Dilemma In Architecture And Engineering" essay for you Create order The Importance of Following Protocol Rules and procedures are put into place for a reason and these should never be broken even if itll cost more money or push a deadline back farther. Each engineer has and should follow the engineers code of ethics. The very first code article Fundamental Canon section one states, hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public(NSPE). This code is being violated many times because the engineers move head with build the structure without verification to move ahead which then puts the engineers life and others life in danger. Engineer companies have liabilities and deal with failing structures differently and how the consequences are dealt with. Most of these liabilities are put in place after a building fails not before or when building the structure. The communities affected by this issue are the structural engineers, construction workers, business people, families, and the people using the unsafe building. Consumer and Society Perspectives The biggest concern of a failing building is who is harmed and if there were any deaths. The families of person that died normal blame the death on the designers and construction works and want to receive money for the life they lost. The big question then begins to rise; what is the money value of life? Each life is different and theres not a specific number so this is hard to answer in court and the money value that the family wants isnt always what they receive. In terms of why an engineer would skip being checked is that if that is the lives of others being killed is less than the cost of the building then it would be alright is the building might fail. The consumers of these building want to be in the building by a certain to make money faster or be in their house to spend less money. These engineers feel the pressure to meet these deadlines problems begin to take over and some are out of the engineers control. If the material that was sent is wrong and to get the right material cost more money and would put the building time back the engineers might use the delivered material to not waste material and spend more money without getting approved. Going back to the value of life, if someone dies due to a failing building how old they are and where the building is might refine the value. Life expectancy in each country is different meaning the value of life in each country would be different. Andorra has the highest expected life span being 82.5 years and their value will be on the higher end of value of life. In the Central African Republic, the life expectancy is only 44.5 years giving them a lower value of life (Life Expectancy). In the United States the expected lifespan is 78.75 years, back in 2012 the money value of life was but as $7 million to $9 million dollars. In 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency placed the money value at $9.1 million (Partnoy). There is an issue of setting money values onto life because it is an ethical dilemma on its own, as each agency comes up with a different number and it depends on the situation. It has been predicted that the minimum value of life of one year is $129,000. Once this is decided determining what to pay the family becomes tricky as do you pay for the life they have spent, to total value of thier life, or the part of life that they didnt experience because of their death. Ways to help determine who was in the wrong, why they did it, and much needs to be paid is the natural law theory and deontology. Natural Law Approach The Natural Law theory is the theory that God gave everyone natural reasoning to make ethical decisions. The law also states that live is above all importance and dont put lives in danger. This is the side the consumer and family would take as they see the collapsed building as the engineers put others lives in harm. When proceeding to build a structure without verification the engineer put lives in danger and that disobeys the natural law theory meaning the engineer was in the wrong. The limitations of this approach are that it shows the view of the victims so that it uses bias to get the most amount of benefit out of a court charge, and it uses religion and not every area around the world believe all in the same theory. Deontology Approach The deontology is when there is a relationship between ethical decisions or morality actions and duty. This means what someone did was because they that it was right and did it because it was the right thing to do. As the engineer this is the theory that they would side on. When the engineer continues to build, they arent thinking of the people they might kill because it is not a for sure situation, rather they think of it as saving money for the company by using the cheaper material and not sending back the wrong material, as well as meeting the deadlines for the business to continue the work process. After the action failed then the engineer will pay for the consequences as they did what they thought was right but failed and still are admitting their wrong doing, they arent denying that overlooking the material was not a mistake. Based off a study from 1977-2000 buildings are 30-52 percent more likely to collapse doing service not during construction, this has been increasing over time (Hadipriono, Wardhana). What this means is the engineers see nearly no danger during the time of construction, so they think they did the right thing by being more efficient. Evaluation Reconsider if efficiency should be prioritized over the potential risk of human life when building a structure, the natural law theory shows that life should be saved and not put at ask while the deontology theory states that doing what is right is the right action to take. When deciding the value of the life that was lost deontology should be used because the engineer might be at fault, but they were doing what they thought was the right thing to do at the time, they were not thinking of killing people. To avoid this ethical dilemma more laws should be put in place to prevent any construction to begin without verification from a superior. This solution will make the building process slower but to make sure the construction worker, and the consumers are safe more restrictions should be enforced. Bibliography https://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdfs/Ethics/CodeofEthics/NSPECodeofEthicsforEngineers.pdf https://realestate.findlaw.com/construction-defects/legal-liability-for-construction-defects.html Life Expectancy. (2009). In Tribune Content Agency Graphics. Retrieved from https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CT3294260489/GIC?u=meri83642sidLGICxid=0e3003b4 Gogoleva, Anna S., et al. PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES IN RESEARCH INTO THE QUALITY OF WORK LIFE IN ORGANISATIONAL STUDIES. Society and Economy: Journal of the Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 39, no. 4, 2017, p. 597+. Global Issues in Context, https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A519075649/GIC?u=meri83642sid=GICxid=28fddfc3. Accessed 11 Sept. 2018. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/583d0dac53bee750c6ce8df5 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9e66/485748af29ac28f18234ada60d7126b9abb6.pdf https://www.theglobalist.com/the-cost-of-a-human-life-statistically-speaking/ https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/how-much-will-we-pay-year-life https://opentextbc.ca/ethicsinlawenforcement/chapter/2-8-natural-law/